100% healed policies = 100% discrimination 3

By V. James DeSimone

For an employee who depends on her job, having to take a disability leave for medical treatment is a frightening prospect.  Picture Cynthia, a 29 year old employee of a major restaurant chain, who suffers from severe and intermittent pain in her hips while walking as the result of a condition stemming from childbirth.  Despite her pain, she performs her job as a server and event coordinator in an exemplary and enthusiastic manner.

After eight years on the job, however, the pain becomes so great that she schedules  surgery on both hips.   Unfortunately, she experiences complications, but Cynthia perseveres through subsequent surgeries and a painful rehabilitation, determined to get well enough to return to work and her normal life.

At each step of the way, she keeps her employer updated on her status, confident that she will be able to do her job with minimal restrictions.  Finally, after an extended medical leave of absence from work, she is ready to go back to the job she loves and on which she depends.

But there is a stumbling block.  She is ready to come back to work and suggests a less physically demanding retail position. However, the Human Resources Director informs her, “don’t come back until you are 100% better,” and Cynthia is never going to be “100% healed.”  She will always have limitations that will require some accommodation from her employer in order to perform her job.

However, she is not deterred.  In anticipation of returning to work, Cynthia schedules a meeting with her supervisors to discuss the modifications she will need, but they cancel it. Then, out of the blue, she receives a letter from the company terminating her employment.  The reason:  job abandonment — failure to return from leave.

Cynthia’s experience is not unique. Employee advocates report that termination after a disability leave or a request for accommodation are two of the most frequent reasons why an employee will contact a lawyer.   According to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”), one of the “hottest areas of EEOC litigation right now involves the agency’s efforts to root out inflexible leave policies – particularly those that supposedly eliminate an employer’s legal obligation to explore and make reasonable accommodations for employees returning from medical leaves of absence.”

The California Commission on Health and Safety and Worker Compensation has published a “Helping Injured Employees Return to Work,” a handbook of practical guidance for businesses.    It provides as examples of inappropriate policies:

  • Requiring that injured employees be released to full duty without restrictions or be healed 100 percent before returning.
  • Always terminating an employee if he or she is unable to return to full duty after a specific, fixed period.
  • Delaying discussion of job accommodations until the employee’s condition is permanent and stationary.

Almost all courts that have examined these so-called “100% healed” policies have concluded that they are an outright violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act.   When an employee is out on disability leave, companies must communicate with the employee, preferably in person, in what is called the good faith interactive process.  All attempts to reasonably accommodate the employee to allow him or her to perform the essential functions of the job should be made.

The rules for reasonable accommodations protect all of us.  After all, we never know when one of us or a loved one may become sick or injured and require some form of leave or accommodation.  It’s a shame that it sometimes takes a lawsuit to hold companies accountable when they break the rules.  But what’s clear is this — when it comes to “100% healed” policies, employers should take heed that the justice system is going to hold them 100% liable.

About V. James DeSimone

Civil rights attorney V. James DeSimone, of V. James DeSimone Law of Marina del Rey, has dedicated his 36-year law career to providing vigorous and ethical representation to achieve justice for those whose civil and constitutional rights are violated. His team represents individuals and families in employment, police misconduct, school abuse, and personal injury cases. You can find out more about their work at www.vjamesdesimonelaw.com

3 thoughts on “100% healed policies = 100% discrimination

  1. Reply Scott Ames Oct 4,2013 9:41 am

    Great piece Jim and very timely. I’ve been seeing a lot of these policies over the past year from current and prospective clients.

  2. wrappedtighter@yahoo.com' Reply injuredwrkerpa Mar 3,2014 10:03 am

    I was injured in a work related auto accident (not my fault) was treated horrible by ER\HR\Manager and was forced onto LTD. I asked for accommodations but was never give an interactive process infact I was simply ignored until I was terminated stating the 100 healed policy – I did file EEOC with in limits. ER now wants to settle for little and wants me to sign away right to sue. I was awarded SSDI but would rather be working and believe with accommodation I could

  3. bheilman@ucsc.edu' Reply injuredchemist Apr 15,2014 9:09 pm

    This piece gives me hope during my troubled journey through recovery. Following a devastating work injury, I asked my boss if I could return to modified duty a couple weeks after my initial surgery if approved by my doctor. He agreed. During my return to modified duty, I was treated with nothing but hostility and disrespect by my employer. Even though my injury was no fault of my own and I violated no work policies, I received almost no sympathy for my traumatic injury and was completely stripped of my value as a highly trained employee (PhD). On my second day of light duty work, I was told that I was a liability to the company and that the position required a fully capable employee. I was not offered an means of accomodation or interactive resolution. Instead of receiving the support of my coworkers during my recovery, I am left looking to the judicial system to grant me dignity and ease my pain.

Leave a Reply to injuredchemist Cancel Reply